On Friday, February 10, 2012 10:38:12 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Scott Kitterman Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:26 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-as-08.txt > > > > My comment against your proposed fix (probably is/i.e.) is still > > applicable to this version. > > 8.6 says "is probably a forgery" and includes at the end "(e.g., a message > that is also DKIM-signed by the same domain, and that signature > validates)". Was that not it?
Yes. That was it. Sorry for the noise. > (e.g. is more correct than i.e., I believe, since there could be other > cases.) At this point I think it's a fully enumerated list, so I think i.e. is correct. BTW, I think some people have been over-reading what this says. I don't think it says you can't through some heuristic pick a certain email address to report abuse to. I hope it says you can't pick that address to report abuse to in this case because it's the mail from address. In that context, I'm really lacking ideas on what might go in this list. Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
