On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:31:01 PM Shmuel Metz wrote: > In <1995466.1FV58W8Wkm@scott-latitude-e6320>, on 02/15/2012 > > at 12:11 AM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> said: > >Is there a reason not to just reference the DKIM and SPF drafts that > >define how to select the reporting address? It seems to me that > >would be a lot clearer. > > I'd endorse adding such language for messages that are authenticated > by DKIM or SPF, but I believe that the general statement is still > needed for other messages.
I don't think it's possible for this applicability statement to cover arbitrary authentication technologies. I think it can only address the ones we have. I don't mind if we make the references to the DKIM and SPF drafts exemplary, but that doesn't mean arbitrary things will work. Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
