On Wed 25/Apr/2012 10:18:50 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > The diff: http://www.blackops.org/~msk/marf-as.html
Further introduction to this topic may be found in [RFC6449], which is effectively an Applicability Statement written outside of the IETF and thus never achieved IETF consensus. Much of the content for that document was input to this one. That's a useful clarification, but possibly not as accurate as it could. If I knew IETF standardization enough, I'd propose text to say what we mean to do, something along the lines of (AIUI): Further advice on this topic can be found in [RFC6449], which is effectively an Applicability Statement written outside of the IETF. Rather than modify that document and then turn it into an IETF Standard, the IETF republished it as an Informational document and then publishes this document, which confers IETF Standard status to selected parts of the former one, while updating it as appropriate. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
