Hi Benoit,
At 16:07 25-04-2012, Benoit Claise wrote:
You know, I see rfc6449, published a few months back, and I see this
document draft-ietf-marf-as-14, which will be published approx. 6 months
And I'm wondering, as someone not involved in this WG...
- Why do we have two almost similar documents?
- Why RFC 6449 could not be a MARF document?
From RFC 6449:
"This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not
be created, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to
translate it into languages other than English."
As a note to John Levine, RFC 6449 clearly says that "it does not
represent the consensus of the IETF."
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf