Hi, MARK!

On Oct 13, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Sergei Golubchik <s...@mariadb.org> wrote:
> >
> > There is development and support for TokuDB. The main reason for
> > dropping it could be RocksDB based engine covering all TokuDB use
> > cases, but better. I mean, *if* RocksDB will be able to do that,
> > then TokuDB won't be needed (it's *if*, not a certainty).
> 
> Is MariaDB.com providing the development for TokuDB or are you
> speculating about the commitment to it provided by someone else? If
> the latter, then it would be better to hear directly from them. If the
> former, can you be more specific about what MariaDB.com plans to do
> for TokuDB?

I am speculating about the commitment to it provided by Percona.
Based on what (I believe) Peter said, and it's in the Colin email too:

>>> Peter says that bugs are fixed for customers... and there is ongoing
>>> development to make it better

but mainly based on the changes I see in TokuDB codebase inside
Percona Server:

5.6.32-78.1 -  73 files changed,  4192 insertions(+), 3715 deletions(-)
5.6.31-77.0 -  35 files changed,   153 insertions(+),   79 deletions(-)
5.6.30-76.3 -  77 files changed,   862 insertions(+),  309 deletions(-)
5.6.29-76.2 -  25 files changed,   487 insertions(+),  153 deletions(-)
5.6.28-76.1 -  14 files changed,   997 insertions(+),  182 deletions(-)
5.6.27-76.0 - 206 files changed, 15619 insertions(+), 5969 deletions(-)
5.6.26-74.0 - initial checkin (into mergetrees/tree/merge-tokudb-5.6 repo)

I agree that it doesn't prove that they will continue to do so in the
future.

If MariaDB.com has any plans about TokuDB - I don't know about them.

Regards,
Sergei
Chief Architect MariaDB
and secur...@mariadb.org

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to     : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to