Hi, MARK! On Oct 13, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Sergei Golubchik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There is development and support for TokuDB. The main reason for > > dropping it could be RocksDB based engine covering all TokuDB use > > cases, but better. I mean, *if* RocksDB will be able to do that, > > then TokuDB won't be needed (it's *if*, not a certainty). > > Is MariaDB.com providing the development for TokuDB or are you > speculating about the commitment to it provided by someone else? If > the latter, then it would be better to hear directly from them. If the > former, can you be more specific about what MariaDB.com plans to do > for TokuDB?
I am speculating about the commitment to it provided by Percona. Based on what (I believe) Peter said, and it's in the Colin email too: >>> Peter says that bugs are fixed for customers... and there is ongoing >>> development to make it better but mainly based on the changes I see in TokuDB codebase inside Percona Server: 5.6.32-78.1 - 73 files changed, 4192 insertions(+), 3715 deletions(-) 5.6.31-77.0 - 35 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) 5.6.30-76.3 - 77 files changed, 862 insertions(+), 309 deletions(-) 5.6.29-76.2 - 25 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-) 5.6.28-76.1 - 14 files changed, 997 insertions(+), 182 deletions(-) 5.6.27-76.0 - 206 files changed, 15619 insertions(+), 5969 deletions(-) 5.6.26-74.0 - initial checkin (into mergetrees/tree/merge-tokudb-5.6 repo) I agree that it doesn't prove that they will continue to do so in the future. If MariaDB.com has any plans about TokuDB - I don't know about them. Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and [email protected] _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
