> I can think of an obvious use-case against this: what if I type an > ordered list up, and then decide to cut & paste to re-order it or add > items to it? Now, in the optimal case I would want to go through and > change the numbering of all the elements. In the meantime, though, I > think it's great that I can rapidly reorder my list and markdown will > *do what makes sense*.
Is it so much work, though, to then change the numbers of just the first two items to "1." and "2."? Note that I am not suggesting that all numbers must be consecutive - just the first two. In fact, I would also throw in the idea of making the numbers themselves optional for all subsequent elements. I.e. the following should be enough: 1. Item one 2. Item two . Item three . Item four . Item five or: 1. Item one 2. Item two n. Item three n. Item four n. Item five - yuri -- http://sputnik.freewisdom.org/ _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
