david parsons wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Yuri Takhteyev <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it so much work, though, to then change the numbers of just the
first two items to "1." and "2."? Note that I am not suggesting that
all numbers must be consecutive - just the first two. In fact, I
would also throw in the idea of making the numbers themselves optional
for all subsequent elements. I.e. the following should be enough:
1. Item one
2. Item two
. Item three
. Item four
. Item five
But that's not very readable, is it?
When I look at a list in the source document, I'd expect to see
a list. I don't know of very many (if any) cases where the
numbers in the list just sort of trail off and leave every item
prefixed with a bullet.
It is also hard to distinguish between . for numbered list and - for
bullet list when reading.
-david parsons
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
