On 3/16/08, John Gabriele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Those three things I think would pretty much satisfy a large swath of > currently unsatisfied users.
You're close, IMO. Definition lists and an explicit code block delimiter that doesn't depend on indents (yet nevertheless nests as written) are the big gaps. Table syntax is just a matter of completeness, and choosing one of the usual suspects. Class and id attributes are part of a different bundle and might be in the extension space. The ambiguity of `_`, `__`, `*`, and `**` is an unfortunate design flaw that likewise can be sorted in the extension space, or not. You're right, though, that recent complaints here are legitimate where they consider Markdown's unfinished business. They are illegitimate where they would lift the term 'Markdown' to an unsanctioned scope or purpose. Those folks can build their own tool and give it a new name. LQ _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
