On Mar 16, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Jacob Rus wrote:
It’s harsh but reasonable language in my opinion. If you are going
to make something which is not Markdown (i.e. has other bits of
syntax not specified in John's description of that language), then
you should call it by a name other than “Markdown”.
That's my point exactly.
And for those of you who think Markdown is "stagnating", I have web
server logs that show otherwise. Do I wish that I'd made more time by
this point to do an official 1.5 or 2.0 release? Yes. But the current
version, as-is, is *gaining* popularity.
Something called "Markdown" on CPAN, which has *my* name on it
(because the original Text::Markdown was based on my work, and was in
fact "Markdown", makes things worse.
-J.G.
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
