In article <[email protected]>,
Waylan Limberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>The original design goals also specifically stated that anything more
>complex that the syntax already supported should be handled by raw
>html. And, well, if you look at the source of his pages (add ".txt" to
>the urls), J.G. almost exclusively uses raw html for his headers.
Hmm? From a casual look at Daring Fireball this morning, about
the only raw html headers I saw were ones where he was id'ing
them (since, alas, the standard doesn't have the [foo](id:bar)
pseudo-protocol.)
>But
>that's not what I would call designed for lazy users.
It might be just me, but the surprise factor of having a header
reach back and grab an entire paragraphs might be less attractive
than it would seem, even to the body of users who write long headers
with a text editor that forces line-wrap at 80 characters.
-david parsons
>
>But, well, we can't change it now.
>
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
