In article <[email protected]>,
John MacFarlane <[email protected]> wrote:
>`a`
>
>should render as
>
><code>a</code>
>
>but discount (at least the version on babelmark) renders it as
The version on Babelmark might be a little out of date; the
1.6 series doesn't leave that tick hanging.
>`` a```a ``
>
>should render as
>
><code>a```a</code>
Now that's a defect all right. It looks like the reference
matches any run of ticks, not just the one or two that I read
from the standard.
That's easy to fix. Harder if I want it to be elegant, but
still easy. It will give me an excuse to release a 1.6.3
sometime next week.
-david parsons
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
