> What it does need is one central voice. That's one way to do it, and as unlikely as it may seem, cooperation is another way. In that case, a will to cooperate is necessary.
In any case, it seems useful to at least clean up and disambiguate a common Markdown core. I think Markdown would be more useful were it (and this community) more coherent. If that means the installation of a new sovereign, so be it. Anyway, my own interest favours the more general problem of an unambiguous syntax for structured text (rather than an alternative representation for HTML) and I certainly don't expect Markdown to address that, though I imagine others reading this list share similar interest. _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
