Le 2011-02-13 à 15:31, David Chambers a écrit :
>> Well, yes, it might be wrong, but that's how the language works ("one after
>> the opening, one before the closing" is what <
>> http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#code> says, And it
>> gives an example (`` `foo` ``) as well.
>
> John's examples suggest that this stripping should apply only within ``
> double-backticked `` contexts. I imagine his intention was to avoid the
> leading and trailing spaces in `` `foo` `` (required by the syntax) from
> being included in the output. I can't imagine any reason to strip whitespace
> in regular ` single-backticked ` contexts.
Then what about ` ``foo`` ` ?
--
Michel Fortin
[email protected]
http://michelf.com/
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
