> > Then what about ` ``foo`` ` ?
Excellent point. That I had not considered. Perhaps what I'm trying to achieve is simply not possible using pure Markdown. *Edge cases.* >.< On 13 February 2011 12:49, Michel Fortin <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 2011-02-13 à 15:31, David Chambers a écrit : > > >> Well, yes, it might be wrong, but that's how the language works ("one > after > >> the opening, one before the closing" is what < > >> http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#code> says, And it > >> gives an example (`` `foo` ``) as well. > > > > John's examples suggest that this stripping should apply only within `` > > double-backticked `` contexts. I imagine his intention was to avoid the > > leading and trailing spaces in `` `foo` `` (required by the syntax) from > > being included in the output. I can't imagine any reason to strip > whitespace > > in regular ` single-backticked ` contexts. > > Then what about ` ``foo`` ` ? > > > -- > Michel Fortin > [email protected] > http://michelf.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Markdown-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
