> What I'm saying here is that relying on 3rd parties solutions while a very > cheap (or even free) VPS would be sufficient is asking for unnecessary > trouble. >
I agree that we should opt for convenient, preferably free hosting. I don't mean to start a technical argument about "static" vs "dynamic" web pages. What I'm trying to convey is that GitHub, while an incredibly easy CMS, only supports static web pages, not wikis, which require a running system that can modify a database for wiki edits. That's why I call "dynamic", if you prefer to call this something else, I'm open to better terminology. Joyent is a simple service offering free cloud hosting for Node.js applications. I'm not saying we have to use Joyent, Node.js, or even JavaScript for our website. I'm just saying it's an easy option. If we'd overall prefer a whole VPS solution, that's fine too. If we're just interested in a basic CMS, that's also fine. What are our options for domain names? markdown.com is unfortunately taken<http://www.markdown.com/> . -- Cheers, Andrew Pennebaker www.yellosoft.us
_______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
