<quote who="Joachim Noreiko"> > > This has already been discussed. > > IIRC, the outcome was the marketing wants snazzy pages that present parts > of gnome, not necesarily single modules or apps, and module and app teams > will throw a hissy fit if they lose their little corner of webspace. So we > end up with a kludge, which is the story of OSS.
Those ideas never needed to be in opposition, but were pushed that way. They are not mutually exclusive. > > That doesn't have to imply Yet Another Subdomain. > > Ok, then let's stick it at wgo/support. But wgo/support is a general page > that points to forums, to irc, other support channels etc. So we're > putting it at wgo/forums? What's wrong with www.gnomesupport.org? There's no reason it can't integrate with the new site design, implementation, infrastructure, or all of the above. - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ "Linux is not like Novell, it isn't going to run out of money - it started off bankrupt, in a way." - Steve Ballmer -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
