<quote who="Joachim Noreiko"> > > Those ideas never needed to be in opposition, but were pushed that way. > > They are not mutually exclusive. > > Fair enough. But then what's your objection? Using the projects.g.o > subdomain?
Yes. It's unnecessary. > > What's wrong with www.gnomesupport.org? There's no reason it can't > > integrate with the new site design, implementation, infrastructure, or > > all of the above. > > I think it's confusing to pop out of the gnome.org family of URLs. For whom? Most people don't give a crap about URLs. They're strings of meaningless crap. Phishing is a testament to that. > Surely a completely different domain is even worse than a subdomain? The content already exists there, working URLs, etc. Why move it? Making it look, feel and work in a more integrated fashion is definitely worthwhile. Shifting it wholesale to make the URL pretty is not. - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ "Of course i can see iso-8859-1 characters, I'm French." - Christian Marillat -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
