On Wed, May 22, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > The last ASF board meeting dissolved the ConCom PMC, and has split out > responsibilities to other parts of the foundation. This impacts us > specifically, in that approvals for the use of our Brand (including > events) are primarily the responsibility of the PMC. > > That being said, we are now being asked to switch from concom approval > to a trademarks@ lazy consensus. Guidance from the board was to change > our trademark guidelines to require trademarks@ lazy concensus, and that > the PMC was actually accountable for all of these approvals.
This looks good to me, with one question: Who speaks for the PMC here? Should we have someone on point for this so we ensure that people get a response in a timely fashion? We should also spell out: Put a [SPONSORSHIP] tag in the subject of the email, starting a new thread for each event - so we explicitly see an email for each event in its own thread. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier [email protected] Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
