On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:41:21PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013, at 02:36 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Who speaks for the PMC here? Should we have someone on point for this so > > > we ensure that people get a response in a timely fashion? > > > > > > > I personally like the board's method of approving new PMC members - at > > least one director ACKs and given silence you get approved, and I > > think that works well here. Any PMC member can raise a flag if > > concerned, but doesn't require a vote or any real process to speak of, > > aside from time. > > OK. Let's see how that works, and make sure someone is ACK'ing...
Getting back to my SPOF point, all PMC members on this list should share that responsibility. ;-) > > > > We should also spell out: Put a [SPONSORSHIP] tag in the subject of the > > > email, starting a new thread for each event - so we explicitly see an > > > email for each event in its own thread. > > > > > > > I don't understand the benefit of this. Who would it benefit? This > > list isn't a high volume one to begin with, so not like we need to > > create tons of rules for filtering email. > > Just because this list isn't high volume doesn't mean that the > recipients aren't receiving a lot of email... Honestly, I'd say we add it to the doc, but we don't ignore requests that forget it. > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > [email protected] > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >
