All great points in this thread - thanks!
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:24:58AM -0400, Christopher Swenson wrote: > I also like version 2. Agree with the reverse black and white. > > What about "powered by" up top and "apache CloudStack" on bottom. > Enlarge the letters for those and shrink CloudStack.apache.org to very > small print under "Apache CloudStack" > > The powered by and apache CloudStack letters should be very prominent > on the logo IMHO. The site, not so much. > > -Chris > > Chris Swenson > Mobile: +1-404-281-5954 > Twitter/Skype/YIM: cpswen > > On Oct 2, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Kelly Hair <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Good point about 3 colors! > > > > > > > > On 10/2/13 4:17 PM, "White, Kim" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> The option 2 is a cleaner design. > >> How about version 2 but reverse the black and white? > >> Make the background white and the lettering black. > >> > >> If you can get to 3 colors (with one being black or white) it is > >> easier/less expensive to replicate on physical things. > >> > >> --kim > >> > >> Kim White > >> NetApp > >> 408.822.3125 Direct > >> 925.998.4252 Mobile > >> [email protected] > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 12:56 PM > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Subject: [DISCUSS] Powered By Logo > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've taken the liberty of creating 2 options for a "Powered By" logo for > >> CloudStack. > >> > >> http://84.51.246.11/poweredby/poweredbyversion1.png > >> > >> http://84.51.246.11/poweredby/poweredbyversion2.png > >> > >> They are the same basic design, with some color adjustments. > >> > >> I'm looking for feedback - good, bad, whatever - on direction and / or the > >> two options I'm proposing. > >> > >> Any thoughts? > >> > >> -chip > > >
