The tagline is a very different topic, and requires further discussion On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 at 16:36 Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6 April 2015 at 11:28, Javier Candeira <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > We aborted the vote because is wasn't clear if deadline is 5th April > > > at 00:00:00 or at 23:59:59. And since the first case was surprise for > > > Javier who planned to finish his version in the right before deadline, > > > we choose the deadline at the end of the 5th day. > > > Suddenly, he didn't send us anything and the time is over - todays 6th > > > on my UTC clocks. Robert, run another vote! > > > > > > > I did send a tagline, so it was not all for naught. Yes, please, this is > my > > first vote! > > > > Robert: can we vote taglines and logos separately? > > > > I am afraid I will bloat this now but I would like to know if it makes > sense to vote for the tagline and logo separately. I think we can do it, > because it is most likely, that you can take one logo and combine it with > different taglines. > > On the other hand I can imagine, that there are some logo creators who made > a logo based on a tagline. I suggest they should still put the tagline to > the logo for understanding but should know, that we are voting for the logo > solely. > > Do we have more different taglines at all? I remember there was a thread > about taglines two month ago or so. > > I suggest to run the logo vote for now and start another vote for the > tagline later. > > Cheers > > Andy > > -- > Andy Wenk > Hamburg - Germany > RockIt! > > GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc >
