On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 17:31 +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > You should have license and author, and derive it via ODF processing > and not enter it with a simple CCK field. Moreover, it should be > investigated what kind of commitment the Document Foundation took > towards Richard Stallman about "nonfree add-ons", see > http://www.documentfoundation.org/supporters
Hi Andrea, Well, that is how the OO.o team did it, reading the license out of the properties of the template - but I'm not so sure that is the right way to do it. I use the templates from time to time and have been burned twice by that little feature - cause if you forget to remove it then the document you create retains the original license, but in the case of work for hire it can not and the final document does not relate any longer to the templates license as far as I an concerned - although other may disagree. I would really like to hear your and other's thoughts on that actually. As for the FSF/ R.S. opinions - not everyone agrees with them as I am sure you are aware. Thanks Drew -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
