Hi, On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:44:04 -0500 webmaster for Kracked Press Productions <[email protected]> wrote: > The "odd" part was referring to the fact that Ubuntu did not use the > standard OOo version in their repository, and even modified it > somewhat to fit their "needs" that made it "their" version.
I know: Beginning this month, I am maintaining the Libreoffice package for Ubuntu. There are very few customizations in the Ubuntu releases left that are not upstream at Libreoffice. The most serious "postprocessing" is the splitting in packages, which we take over almost completely from Debian. > I had to uninstall Ubuntu's OOo version to get the "better" and more > "up-to-date" one from the OOo site. That might have been an issue back in the days, when Ubuntu shipped go-oo releases, while on OOo there where the Sun/Oracle builds. These versions differed significantly in features (and bugs). You will not find significant functional differences between the build from the Libreoffice website and the ones that will turn up in your Ubuntu repositories. And for the few remaining differences: I will work hard to move them upstream to Libreoffice whereever possible. In fact that has already been started: the human/humanity theme for Libreoffice is already in master. Best Regards, Bjoern Michaelsen -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
