Le 27/04/13 07:24 PM, Italo Vignoli a écrit :
On 04/25/2013 10:15 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
If we are to expound the values of LibreOffice in the educational sphere
we need to list those values that really count. We already know of the
obvious ones of file compatibility etc., but we need to work on the
assets that really count to educational organizations.
Hi Marc, it looks like the situation is different, at least by
continent. In Europe, the decision is 99% political, and 1% based on
every other issue. This is true not only for the educational system but
also for governments, and this is the reason why proprietary software
vendors invest a huge amount of money on lobbying.
On the other hand, every point you mention would definitely increase the
competitive positioning of LibreOffice, so they are at least worth some
effort, with the exception of the LTS release issue, as our time based
release schedule has been - and continues to be - instrumental in
attracting new developers (which is one of the most important reasons of
our success so far).
It seems to me that there seems to be a flaw in the ideology behind the
project. There seems to be a want by some devs to keep the project on a
time release schedule, which by and large is great in attracting devs,
but, also a group of devs who are hoping that the distro will translate
into income from the accreditation programme.
Where I believe the whole project is disjointed is that without an LTS,
the TDF/LibreOffice project cuts itself out of the large
institutional/organizational market. I doubt very much that a large
institution wishing to save money on licensing fees would be very
willing to spend the savings on devs trying to keep a version of
LibreOffice up and working from one budget period to the next reasonable
budget term.
To me, it would make much more sense to create an LTS version with our
group of devs working at keeping it as current and solid for the period
of the LTS term and this would allow the possibility of acceptance of
LibreOffice by more organizations, thereby gaining larger income
possibilities for a larger base of our (soon-to-be) accredited devs.
Otherwise, we leave the door open to a larger institution who could
accreditate its own devs and then fork its own version of LTS LibreOffice.
I am not disputing the fact that it is political etc. Just pointing out
that in the past, OpenOffice's slow/non-adoption into larger
organizations was perhaps due to a flaw in our marketing angle and that
perhaps a different approach may give us a better result. If it did not
work before, well, it still won't work now. There is something in our
approach that needs to be addressed and changed.
Our present approach is well suited for LibreOffice adoption by the
small office, home use where the need for an accredited dev is minimal
if not zero. Larger organizations will just look at the fast-paced
development, often-released versions which just seems to scream more
money spent of development and keeping up to date of the software on
their part if they were to adopt it.
Cheers,
Marc
--
Marc Paré
[email protected]
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
