On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Fabian Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > The FSF campaign focuses on free software supports ODF and > specifically encourages to reject *any* documents created with > Microsoft and iWork: > https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument > https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument/reject > > No mention anywhere of any advantages of ODF being supported by > "popular" non-free software, whatever that may mean.
Yes, that's a bit unfortunate omission from the site. The entry was posted in 2011, so I can understand how it might be a bit out of date and not reflect the current capabilities of modern version of MS-Office. That being said, I think the FSF will still be reticent to promote the use of MS-Office under its current licensing scheme. This is precisely why I think we should split-up the campaigns, so the FSF can continue to say "Please use ODF + Free Software," and an interoperability group can say "Please use ODF for interchange." --R -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
