On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:33 PM Warren Camilleri <warrencamill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Drew, > > Howdy, > if i understood correctly for example for General Advertisement > (branding/Cheeky ads like Mac vs PC) to "tickle the Interest of users" > these are usually short adverts say 30s or less. > but if we want to tickle the interest of technical persons (presentation > advertisement) then those would be the long. usually 1 minute or more. > > if this was the meaning as what is being worked on, where is the current > library located for use? (assuming that i am not the only one looking for > such material for airing) > i can point back to the youtube channel which Mike pointed to earliery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIDFFLre08I and two videos in particular there which capture the differences between types of videos. This is Libreoffice (long - features oriented) https://youtu.be/3KC0ZdcA6s8 LibreOffice Viewer for Android (short - brand/emoting oriented) https://youtu.be/zIDFFLre08I There are other items there also as you will see. Best wishes, Drew > > regards, > Warren. > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 17:13, Drew Jensen <drewjensen.in...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> Jonathon's really hit the mark, IMO, with how much of his last email is >> phrased. >> >> Roland has a valid and important view also. >> >> I think the best way to address both, with a 'promo' video, is for TDF to >> work towards three categories of promo videos: >> >> Work Product focused videos; >> ie. LibreOffice. >> 1 Encompassing both differentiating features/benefits (longer) >> 2 Branding (short) >> >> TDF Community focused videos; >> Longer format and cover the what is FOSS & OpenStandards and who is the >> community called The Document Foundation >> >> So I think current video covers work product features and is long. >> I bet there is one that covers the community focus also and it is long. >> I'm figuring anything longer than 30 seconds is long here. >> >> There isn't a short branding video however. Would that be accurate? >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Drew >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:47 PM jonathon <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On 4/17/19 9:11 PM, Roland Hummel wrote: >> > >> > > "Yes, LO is nice but it won't beat MS Office because in MSO we will >> have >> > artificial intelligence". >> > >> > If the battlefield is functionality, and AI is important,in 2018, the >> > five most important AI programming languages were: >> > * Python; >> > * LISP; >> > * C++; >> > * Java; >> > * Prolog; >> > >> > Two (Three? I'm not sure about C++) are built-in macro languages. LISP >> > and Prolog are easy enough to add. >> > >> > There is documentation on installing and using R as a macro language. >> > >> > Which underscores that the big issue in the functionality war, is not >> > what is available, but rather, the knowledge that the features are >> > available, and how to use them. >> > >> > _TL;DR: Documentation, not implementation._ >> > >> > I'm not sure why being able to grab LinkedIn resumes from within Excel >> > is a good thing, but that is the type of functionality that Microsoft is >> > adding. IMNSHO, this type of functionality is best provided by extension >> > developers. >> > >> > End users can more easily customize LibO, than MSO, etc. >> > >> > > base of any argumentation because it is the only superior starting >> > position LO has. >> > >> > For most organizations, ethics is nothing more than a feel-good talking >> > point. Something that is neither implemented, nor observed. >> > As such, appeals based on ethical principles fall upon deaf ears. >> > >> > > Starting from software freedom any further argumentation will convince >> > (at least in societies claiming freedom as fundamental part of a >> society): >> > > -because LO is freedom respecting it is secure >> > > -because LO is freedom respecting it is privacy respecting >> > > -because LO is freedom respecting it serves the user >> > > -because LO is freedom respecting it is sustainable >> > >> > Neither people nor organizations are concerned about those things, until >> > they discover that their data has been passed on to nefarious third >> > parties, by their software vendor. >> > >> > A white paper showing how LibO meets requirements for various privacy >> > related legislation might be useful here. >> > >> > Whilst such a paper might make LibreOffice Cloud Edition look bad, the >> > quasi-redeeming feature is that the user can control the cloud that it >> > is installed on. >> > >> > > In this way LO will convince governments, companies, the educational >> > sector and NGOs, >> > >> > The question to be addressed here, is "Who can be sued, if things go >> > wrong?" >> > >> > Whilst Microsoft's _Terms and Conditions_ claim no liability, that >> > doesn't prevent support companies from being sued, when things go wrong. >> > >> > This is where a lawyer is needed, to explain either who could >> > sucessfully be sued, if LibO goes wrong, or why such a lawsuit would not >> > be filable in the first place. >> > >> > >not by trying to convince users in a perspective that is already >> totally >> > lost to the proprietary sector ("functionality" >> > >> > The functionality issue will be over, when you can pick up _LibreOffice >> > For Managing you Futures Portfolio: Shorts, Straddles, Puts, and >> > Candlesticks_ at your local Office Depot, or _Asteroid Hunting using >> > LibreOffice_ at your local _Books a Million_. >> > >> > (I've only slightly changed the titles of books about Excel, that I've >> > seen in bookstores.) >> > >> > >aka "but MS Office is so easy to use"). >> > >> > Familiarity, not ease of use. >> > >> > jonathon >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org >> > Problems? >> > https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >> > Posting guidelines + more: >> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >> > List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ >> > Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy >> > >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org >> Problems? >> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >> Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >> List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ >> Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy >> > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
