Hey Kamil,

Thanks for the information. I didn't get a chance to update the article
earlier today, but I just added these edits to the article. They should
be visible now.

    http://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-from-fedora-22-to-fedora-23/

Let me know if these changes look alright to you. Thanks again for the
pointers.

--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflo...@fedoraproject.org

On 11/09/2015 11:29 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hello Justin,
> 
> I'm from Fedora QA and I'm writing regarding
> http://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-from-fedora-22-to-fedora-23/
> 
> Could you please make a few adjustments to that article?
> 
> 1. --best should no longer be necessary with latest system-upgrade (0.7), we 
> try to minimize the chance of upgrading just a half of your system. I have to 
> admit I'm not actually sure whether there are or not some cases where it can 
> make a difference, but I think we should be quite OK without recommending it 
> by default.
> 2. --allowerasing should definitely be mentioned, it will be needed if some 
> package needs to be removed (e.g. retired package or with broken deps, most 
> likely third party)
> 3. we have a bug in dnf regarding certain locales like Chinese and Japanese. 
> Can you please point people to a workaround here? 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F23_bugs#system-upgrade-locale
> 
> I can put all of that into comments under that article, but most people won't 
> notice it. It would be much better if it was in the article :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Kamil
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
List info or to change your subscription:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

Reply via email to