Hi Sean! On 2 June 2016 at 11:20, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2 June 2016 at 04:58, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I myself don't see an upside with allowing random ads to be associated > > > with > > > Sugar Labs, for the tiny amount of income we might receive. If indeed our > > > US > > > nonprofit status through SFC would allow gains from advertising. > > > ___Far better to do Calls to Action ("CTA" in their jargon) and > > > Annotations, > > > requesting donations.___ > > > > What data do you have to back up this assertion? :) > > Um, which assertion?
Your assertion that SL would see more revenue from CTA compared to ads. Cheers Dave _______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
