What about "empowers people to bring their own identity, instead of having to sign up for yet another at each site."
On Jan 28, 2008, at 15:38, Dick Hardt wrote: > > On 28-Jan-08, at 1:17 PM, Johannes Ernst wrote: > >> My suggestions: >> - let's define ourselves in positive terms, not by what we are >> not. And who knows, perhaps we will, next quarter? > > my comments in brackets were background information to clarify what > we were stating, not to be part of the message > >> - I like Bill's analogy: >> >>> ... OpenID is a building block upon which end users can/will begin >>> to establish their independence on the web in much the same way >>> that ISPs gave individuals actual email independence from the old >>> walled gardens of that bygone era of Prodigy, Compuserve, and the >>> pre-Internet versions of AOL and MSN. > > An analogy is way to move a message. Let's agree on the message > first! :-) > >> >> And I know everybody will hate me for saying this, but: >> >>> +OpenID is a set of specifications to solve user internet identity >>> problems >> >> >> is not going to be comprehensible to many people. What exactly are >> "user internet identity problems"? > > > This is a messaging platform, not the message. Do we agree that we > want to move this message? Do you have a suggestion on a concise way > of describing the problem? > > -- Dick > > > _______________________________________________ > marketing mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/marketing _______________________________________________ marketing mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/marketing
