On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 09:56 +0200, Elvis Pukk wrote: > Hi, > I'm totally agree with Rob and Jürgen - before we can move on with "logo" > development there should be fixed certain criterias. > > 1) Concept - why the old logo needs renewing (there is always reasons to do > something)? What is the final goal? What should be deffinitelly be on logo? > Etc. > 2) Can we open competition for that? If yes, then: > - timeline > - criterias (size, resolutions, colors, etc.) > - ... > - ... > 3) Final decision - who will make this? When? Etc. >
Hi Elvis, All this has already been discussed and the branding "competition" was decided upon. http://markmail.org/search/?q=%5BPROPOSAL%5D+Branding+4.0#query:% 5BPROPOSAL%5D%20Branding%204.0%20order%3Arelevance+page:1 +mid:t5jiwfohvqky7ivr+state:results What you are talking about is an RFP or Request for Proposal. We need to put up criteria on the RFP, the place for this is on the wiki as Jurgen pointed out: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Brand+Contest+RFP JFDI applies, just fill in what you think should be some criteria. Cheers GL > > I believe we can open competition quite easily - find? committee who will > make final decision and put up criterias. I don't afraid that if this project > is "volunteer" then nobody would like to participate. On the contrary - I > think many would like to get this project into their portfolio. > > Anyway - Estonian Academy of Arts was very intrested in but they need > criterias aswell. > > PS! Yes, it is no problem to me to "sell" them idea to start designig a new > logo for Open Office, but... Can I be sure that this competition will come? > Otherwise people make a lot of work but if nobody even look this, then it is > quite embarrassing to me... > > > But these was just my ideas :) > > With best regards > > Elvis
