If possible my post may please be removed. With Warm Regards
V.Kadal Amutham 919444360480 914422396480 On 25 January 2013 12:20, Peter Junge <[email protected]> wrote: > May I kindly ask to respect our large Chinese community?! Such political > suspicions are off topic here. > > All governments are hacking. The game is called 'Spy vs. Spy.' > > Best regards, > Peter > > > On 1/25/2013 6:57 AM, Kadal Amutham wrote: > >> The map gives a good idea of down loads. Why Canada has more downloads >> than >> US? Why China is less than India? Software piracy may be more in China >> compared to India. Pirated software is also free like OpenOffice. Even >> hacking is sponsored by Chinese Government. They are called ethical >> hacking >> or patriotic hacking. Hacking of Indian sites by Chinese hackers will be >> considered as patriotic. >> >> With Warm Regards >> >> V.Kadal Amutham >> 919444360480 >> 914422396480 >> >> >> On 25 January 2013 08:35, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm a little stumped how to visualize this in a meaningful way. >>> >>> Here it is again with the latest data. This is the best visual I think >>> out >>> of the few I tried: >>> >>> >>> http://www-958.ibm.com/**software/analytics/manyeyes/** >>> visualizations/aoo-downloads-**download-density<http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/visualizations/aoo-downloads-download-density> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Rob, >>>>> >>>>> For the internet population I used the data from the wiki since the >>>>> >>>> link >>> >>>> was already in the google spreadsheet. For the population details, I >>>>> >>>> typed >>>> >>>>> population followed by the country name in the address bar of google >>>>> >>>> and >>> >>>> in >>>> >>>>> most of the searches the result was from www.google.co.in/publicdata. >>>>> >>>> I >>> >>>> do >>>> >>>>> not expect much difference between google data and wiki. You can verify >>>>> >>>> few >>>> >>>>> data and the difference may be in the last 3 digits. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I reviewed the data. Most of it looked fine. As you say, maybe in >>>> the last few digits. I only found a few things to fix. For example >>>> (and I didn't know this before) there are two Congo's now: Democratic >>>> Republic of the Congo and the Republic of the Congo. It looks like the >>>> data there was reversed. Little things like that. >>>> >>>> The top 30 countries, for downloading AOO, normalized by number of >>>> internet users in the country, are: >>>> >>>> 1. Monaco >>>> 2. Italy >>>> 3. France >>>> 4. San Marino >>>> 5. Luxembourg >>>> 6. Belgium >>>> 7. Estonia >>>> 8. Germany >>>> 9. Switzerland >>>> 10. Finland >>>> 11. Spain >>>> 12. Hong Kong >>>> 13. Austria >>>> 14. Netherlands >>>> 15. Canada >>>> 16. Belize >>>> 17. Czech Republic >>>> 18. Falkland Islands (Malvinas) >>>> 19. Faroe Islands >>>> 20. Malta >>>> 21. Singapore >>>> 22. Iceland >>>> 23. Taiwan >>>> 24. United Kingdom >>>> 25. United States >>>> 26. Uruguay >>>> 27. Hungary >>>> 28. New Zealand >>>> 29. Ireland >>>> 30. Liechtenstein >>>> >>>> I'm attaching the full spreadsheet. Hopefully Samer can put the >>>> updated figures on the ManEyes website. >>>> >>>> The countries at the bottom of the list, are some where we have >>>> opportunities for growth. For example, South Korea should improve >>>> once the Korean translation is released next week. >>>> >>>> -Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> With Warm Regards >>>>> >>>>> V.Kadal Amutham >>>>> 919444360480 >>>>> 914422396480 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 23 January 2013 23:58, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Some countries didn't get counted (not matched in the tool/didn't >>>>>> >>>>> exist). >>>> >>>>> Some cities got their own row, but the Map doesn't have a spot for >>>>>> >>>>> them. ie >>>> >>>>> Hong Kong and Singapore: >>>>>> Also I think some rows are gone, like "Europe (not specified)", it was >>>>>> there yesterday. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here are two more visualizations: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://www-958.ibm.com/**software/analytics/manyeyes/** >>> visualizations/apache-**openoffice-downloads-vs-pop<http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/visualizations/apache-openoffice-downloads-vs-pop> >>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://www-958.ibm.com/**software/analytics/manyeyes/** >>> visualizations/apache-**openoffice-downloads-vs-pop-2<http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/visualizations/apache-openoffice-downloads-vs-pop-2> >>> >>>> >>>>>> And the original: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://www-958.ibm.com/**software/analytics/manyeyes/** >>> visualizations/apache-**openoffice-downloads-by-pop<http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/visualizations/apache-openoffice-downloads-by-pop> >>> >>>> >>>>>> I didn't have a design in mind in how we want to show this so I just >>>>>> plotted and mashed around with it like playdough. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Samer Mansour <[email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Opps here it is: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://www-958.ibm.com/**software/analytics/manyeyes/** >>> visualizations/apache-**openoffice-downloads-by-pop<http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/visualizations/apache-openoffice-downloads-by-pop> >>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is very nice. We might want to take out the "population" and >>>>>>> "internet users" and the two rank columns and just use the >>>>>>> >>>>>> "downloads >>> >>>> per 1k population" and "downloads per 1k internet users" columns. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I found a few cut & paste errors in the spreadsheet, so it would be >>>>>>> good if we could have some reviewers double check the numbers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Compare columns C and E of this spreadsheet: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/**spreadsheet/ccc?key=** >>> 0Av4Lhq3W5zKodGZtNU1oRGFjWi1kY**XkzVEtjOWY1ZlE#gid=0<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Av4Lhq3W5zKodGZtNU1oRGFjWi1kYXkzVEtjOWY1ZlE#gid=0> >>> >>>> >>>>>>> With the data in these two Wikipedia articles. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**List_of_countries_by_number_** >>> of_Internet_users<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_Internet_users> >>> >>>> >>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**List_of_countries_by_**population<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once reviewed, and we have the updated maps, then I have an idea. We >>>>>>> could do a blog post on these numbers, but frame it as a general >>>>>>> >>>>>> story >>> >>>> about end-user use of desktop open source software, etc. If we make >>>>>>> the story more general interest we'll get broader circulation and >>>>>>> uptake in the press. Of course, it supports a positive story of our >>>>>>> project as well. But by telling the broader story, and using >>>>>>> OpenOffice as an example, we'll go further. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does this make sense? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Rob >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Samer Mansour < >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> [email protected] >>> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here is an updated map. I moved to bubble chart because coloring >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>> >>>>> country made places like Russia and Canada look odd. >>>>>>>>> I will see if I can make other visualizations as well, maybe Map >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is >>> >>>> not >>>>>> >>>>>>> the best visualization. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dear Rob Weir, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The internet user data has been filled >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> With Warm Regards >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> V.Kadal Amutham >>>>>>>>>> 919444360480 >>>>>>>>>> 914422396480 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 23 January 2013 07:23, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> I will start filling the internet user data >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> With Warm Regards >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> V.Kadal Amutham >>>>>>>>>>> 919444360480 >>>>>>>>>>> 914422396480 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 23 January 2013 01:38, Rob Weir <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Kadal Amutham < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Check the google document at >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/**spreadsheet/ccc?key=** >>> 0Av4Lhq3W5zKodGZtNU1oRGFjWi1kY**XkzVEtjOWY1ZlE#gid=0<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Av4Lhq3W5zKodGZtNU1oRGFjWi1kYXkzVEtjOWY1ZlE#gid=0> >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have entered the population data alone >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Very good. I made some edits and also received a spreadsheet >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> with >>>> >>>>> some >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> more data from Gianvittorio. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The results are interesting. For example, what countries >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> have >>> >>>> the >>>> >>>>> highest percentage of downloads by population? The top 5 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> are: >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Gambia >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Trinidad and Tobago >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Zimbabwe >>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Vatican City >>>>>>>>>>>> 5) Saint Pierre and Miquelon >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It will be interesting to see how the data is when we look at >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> usage >>>>>> >>>>>>> per internet users in a country. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But however we slice the data we'll have this problem: For >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> very >>>> >>>>> small >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> countries, just a few downloads can shift the ratio by a >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> large >>> >>>> amount. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For example, the Vatican City had around 100 downloads. So >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> a >>> >>>> difference of 10 downloads is 10%. France had 4.5 million >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> downloads. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A difference of 10 downloads is nothing. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've seen this handled in other contexts by applying >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> statistical >>>> >>>>> techniques to estimate error bounds on the ratio, and then >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> rank by >>>> >>>>> the >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> lower confidence limit. You can see the technique described >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (and >>>> >>>>> formulas given) here: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://evanmiller.org/how-not-**to-sort-by-average-rating.html<http://evanmiller.org/how-not-to-sort-by-average-rating.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Rob >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> With Warm Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> V.Kadal Amutham >>>>>>>>>>>>> 919444360480 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 914422396480 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 January 2013 22:26, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good show. I have almost entered the population data into >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>> >>>>> spread >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sheet. Then I have to populate the internet user data. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Once >>> >>>> it >>>> >>>>> is >>>>>> >>>>>>> over, I >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> will let you know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> With Warm Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> V.Kadal Amutham >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 919444360480 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 914422396480 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 January 2013 21:37, Samer Mansour < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We don't have internet users completely populated so from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>> >>>>> data >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> currently have I whipped something up in 5 mins at work. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is just the top 40 Countries. Its manual data >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> entry, >>> >>>> once >>>>>> >>>>>>> we >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> internet users populated and I will resolve things like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hong >>>> >>>>> Kong" -> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "China" and Singapore -> South Korea. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can maybe finish some data entry tonight. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://www-958.ibm.com/**software/analytics/manyeyes/** >>> visualizations/aoo-test-**visualization<http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/visualizations/aoo-test-visualization> >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a PNG output: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://www-958.ibm.com/**software/analytics/manyeyes/**vis/FullScreen/ >>> **fullscreenvisualization.html?**id=files%2Fthumbnails%** >>> 2Ffed90050-64ac-11e2-926b-**000255111976.wm.png&visId=** >>> ff062cd864ac11e2926b0002551119**76<http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/vis/FullScreen/fullscreenvisualization.html?id=files%2Fthumbnails%2Ffed90050-64ac-11e2-926b-000255111976.wm.png&visId=ff062cd864ac11e2926b000255111976> >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Rob Weir < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Kadal Amutham < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Rob, I tried to edit the document, but it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read >>>> >>>>> only. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Can >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make it readable so that everybody can fill the data? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. I gave you and Samer write permissions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Rob >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With Warm Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> V.Kadal Amutham >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 919444360480 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 914422396480 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 January 2013 09:01, Kadal Amutham < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who ever finds time, can fill the remaining Data, so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>> >>>>> the >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> document >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become complete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With Warm Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> V.Kadal Amutham >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 919444360480 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 914422396480 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 January 2013 07:46, Rob Weir < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Galoppini < >>> >>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Rob Weir < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was thinking of putting together a world map >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> showing >>>>>> >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> use of >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenOffice, the kind with each country shaded or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> color >>>>>> >>>>>>> coded >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> show >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the density of use. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can easily get a data set showing the total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number >>>> >>>>> of >>>>>> >>>>>>> downloads of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenOffice per country. But the raw numbers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>> >>>> really >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> tell >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story. It would show, probably, that the USA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has >>> >>>> the >>>> >>>>> most >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> downloads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But that is probably also because of its large >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> population. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So maybe we then show downloads per capita, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloads >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> per >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 100,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> population. But that then becomes a proxy for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> economic >>>>>> >>>>>>> development, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since there are highly populated countries with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fewer >>>> >>>>> computers >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> per >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capital, and low population countries with more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> computers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think that is what we want to show. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm wondering, has anyone seen data for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something >>>> >>>>> like >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PCs >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> per >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capita, or home computers, or internet users, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>> >>>>> other >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> proxy >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what our potential usership would be per >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> country? >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can use internet users stats by country, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> like: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**List_of_countries_by_number_** >>> of_Internet_usersto<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_Internet_usersto> >>> >>>> normalize our stats. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, that looks useful. I started entering the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data >>>> >>>>> into >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> spreadsheet: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/**spreadsheet/ccc?key=** >>> 0Av4Lhq3W5zKodGZtNU1oRGFjWi1kY**XkzVEtjOWY1ZlE<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Av4Lhq3W5zKodGZtNU1oRGFjWi1kYXkzVEtjOWY1ZlE> >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you see, Italy is at the top, if you look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloads >>>>>> >>>>>>> per >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1000 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> internet users, with 91. So nearly one in ten in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Italy >>>> >>>>> have >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> downloaded AOO! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Rob >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Rob >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This e- mail message is intended only for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named >>> >>>> recipient(s) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> above. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may contain confidential and privileged >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information. >>>> >>>>> If >>>>>> >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intended recipient you are hereby notified that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>> >>>> ... > > [Message clipped]
