Here is an updated map. I moved to bubble chart because coloring the country made places like Russia and Canada look odd. I will see if I can make other visualizations as well, maybe Map is not the best visualization.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Rob Weir, > > The internet user data has been filled > > With Warm Regards > > V.Kadal Amutham > 919444360480 > 914422396480 > > > On 23 January 2013 07:23, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I will start filling the internet user data > > > > With Warm Regards > > > > V.Kadal Amutham > > 919444360480 > > 914422396480 > > > > > > On 23 January 2013 01:38, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Check the google document at > >> > > >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Av4Lhq3W5zKodGZtNU1oRGFjWi1kYXkzVEtjOWY1ZlE#gid=0 > >> > > >> > I have entered the population data alone > >> > > >> > >> Very good. I made some edits and also received a spreadsheet with some > >> more data from Gianvittorio. > >> > >> The results are interesting. For example, what countries have the > >> highest percentage of downloads by population? The top 5 are: > >> > >> 1) Gambia > >> 2) Trinidad and Tobago > >> 3) Zimbabwe > >> 4) Vatican City > >> 5) Saint Pierre and Miquelon > >> > >> It will be interesting to see how the data is when we look at usage > >> per internet users in a country. > >> > >> But however we slice the data we'll have this problem: For very small > >> countries, just a few downloads can shift the ratio by a large amount. > >> For example, the Vatican City had around 100 downloads. So a > >> difference of 10 downloads is 10%. France had 4.5 million downloads. > >> A difference of 10 downloads is nothing. > >> > >> I've seen this handled in other contexts by applying statistical > >> techniques to estimate error bounds on the ratio, and then rank by the > >> lower confidence limit. You can see the technique described (and > >> formulas given) here: > >> http://evanmiller.org/how-not-to-sort-by-average-rating.html > >> > >> -Rob > >> > >> > With Warm Regards > >> > > >> > V.Kadal Amutham > >> > 919444360480 > >> > 914422396480 > >> > > >> > > >> > On 22 January 2013 22:26, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Good show. I have almost entered the population data into the spread > >> >> sheet. Then I have to populate the internet user data. Once it is > >> over, I > >> >> will let you know. > >> >> > >> >> With Warm Regards > >> >> > >> >> V.Kadal Amutham > >> >> 919444360480 > >> >> 914422396480 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 22 January 2013 21:37, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> We don't have internet users completely populated so from the data > we > >> >>> currently have I whipped something up in 5 mins at work. > >> >>> This is just the top 40 Countries. Its manual data entry, once we > >> have > >> >>> internet users populated and I will resolve things like "Hong Kong" > -> > >> >>> "China" and Singapore -> South Korea. > >> >>> > >> >>> I can maybe finish some data entry tonight. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> > http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/visualizations/aoo-test-visualization > >> >>> > >> >>> This is a PNG output: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> > http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/vis/FullScreen/fullscreenvisualization.html?id=files%2Fthumbnails%2Ffed90050-64ac-11e2-926b-000255111976.wm.png&visId=ff062cd864ac11e2926b000255111976 > >> >>> > >> >>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected] > > > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > > Dear Mr. Rob, I tried to edit the document, but it is read only. > >> Can > >> >>> you > >> >>> > > make it readable so that everybody can fill the data? > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > OK. I gave you and Samer write permissions. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > -Rob > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > With Warm Regards > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > V.Kadal Amutham > >> >>> > > 919444360480 > >> >>> > > 914422396480 > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > On 21 January 2013 09:01, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > >> Who ever finds time, can fill the remaining Data, so that the > >> >>> document > >> >>> > >> become complete > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> With Warm Regards > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> V.Kadal Amutham > >> >>> > >> 919444360480 > >> >>> > >> 914422396480 > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> On 21 January 2013 07:46, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Roberto Galoppini < > >> >>> > [email protected]> > >> >>> > >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Rob Weir < > >> [email protected]> > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> >> I was thinking of putting together a world map showing the > >> use of > >> >>> > >>> >> OpenOffice, the kind with each country shaded or color > coded > >> to > >> >>> show > >> >>> > >>> >> the density of use. > >> >>> > >>> >> > >> >>> > >>> >> I can easily get a data set showing the total number of > >> >>> downloads of > >> >>> > >>> >> OpenOffice per country. But the raw numbers don't really > >> tell > >> >>> the > >> >>> > >>> >> story. It would show, probably, that the USA has the most > >> >>> > downloads. > >> >>> > >>> >> But that is probably also because of its large population. > >> >>> > >>> >> > >> >>> > >>> >> So maybe we then show downloads per capita, or downloads > per > >> >>> 100,000 > >> >>> > >>> >> population. But that then becomes a proxy for economic > >> >>> development, > >> >>> > >>> >> since there are highly populated countries with fewer > >> computers > >> >>> per > >> >>> > >>> >> capital, and low population countries with more computers, > >> etc. > >> >>> I > >> >>> > >>> >> don't think that is what we want to show. > >> >>> > >>> >> > >> >>> > >>> >> So, I'm wondering, has anyone seen data for something like > >> PCs > >> >>> per > >> >>> > >>> >> capita, or home computers, or internet users, or some other > >> proxy > >> >>> > for > >> >>> > >>> >> what our potential usership would be per country? > >> >>> > >>> >> > >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > Maybe we can use internet users stats by country, something > >> like: > >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_Internet_usersto > >> >>> > >>> > normalize our stats. > >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> Thanks, that looks useful. I started entering the data into a > >> >>> > >>> spreadsheet: > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Av4Lhq3W5zKodGZtNU1oRGFjWi1kYXkzVEtjOWY1ZlE > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> As you see, Italy is at the top, if you look at downloads per > >> 1000 > >> >>> > >>> internet users, with 91. So nearly one in ten in Italy have > >> >>> > >>> downloaded AOO! > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> -Rob > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> >> Regards, > >> >>> > >>> >> > >> >>> > >>> >> -Rob > >> >>> > >>> >> > >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > -- > >> >>> > >>> > ==== > >> >>> > >>> > This e- mail message is intended only for the named > >> recipient(s) > >> >>> > above. > >> >>> > >>> It > >> >>> > >>> > may contain confidential and privileged information. If you > >> are > >> >>> not > >> >>> > the > >> >>> > >>> > intended recipient you are hereby notified that any > >> dissemination, > >> >>> > >>> > distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) > >> is > >> >>> > strictly > >> >>> > >>> > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please > >> >>> > >>> immediately > >> >>> > >>> > notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the > >> >>> message > >> >>> > and > >> >>> > >>> any > >> >>> > >>> > attachment(s) from your system. Thank you. > >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >
