Look simple and neat. I think we can make the site based on Jooma! and
improve the appearance

With Warm Regards

V.Kadal Amutham
919444360480
914422396480


On 2 February 2013 11:48, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote:

> Attachments are probably being stripped from the mailing-list.
>
> http://s3.postimage.org/v39x8vtpv/sample.png
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry Samer Mansour, I could not find an attachment.
> >
> > With Warm Regards
> >
> > V.Kadal Amutham
> > 919444360480
> > 914422396480
> >
> >
> > On 2 February 2013 10:14, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Trying again as attachment.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> My mail client gmail is not displaying the image
> > >>
> > >> With Warm Regards
> > >>
> > >> V.Kadal Amutham
> > >> 919444360480
> > >> 914422396480
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 2 February 2013 10:07, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Update, I've sent Rob Weir a zip with the experiment pages.  I'll
> need
> > >> to
> > >> > touch base with Rob in a few business days.
> > >> > When its set up we can place friendly bets on what we think will
> win.
> > >> >
> > >> > There are 4 experiments, here they are merged together in a single
> > >> screen
> > >> > capture:
> > >> > * Note this is screen cap from a working copy on my desktop,
> > >> > icons/background images are not displayed.  Hosted copies might
> look a
> > >> > little different.
> > >> > [image: Inline image 1]
> > >> >
> > >> > I think #1 will win.  Which ever one between 2 & 3 gets more, we
> might
> > >> > integrate into the site's template for the rest of the website.
> > >> >
> > >> > Samer Mansour
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Samer Mansour <[email protected]
> >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> > Hello Everyone,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Starting a separate thread for integrating a 'Like Us' area into
> > our
> > >> >> > website templates.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > The Experiment scope would be the home page, to provide users the
> > >> >> ability
> > >> >> > to:
> > >> >> > - Follow Us on Twitter
> > >> >> > - Like Us on Facebook
> > >> >> > - Follow Us on Google+
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > This will improve the number of people reached when we
> communicate
> > >> >> through
> > >> >> > these relatively new streams of communication we have set up.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I will draw up some placements of the 'Like Us' (html files) for
> > the
> > >> >> home
> > >> >> > page for another google experiment.  I can have this done within
> a
> > >> week.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Great.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> A few things I learned from the last experiment:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 1) It is OK to track the events with the social network as the
> > >> >> "label", e..g,  _gaq.push(['_trackEvent','social', 'shareDownload',
> > >> >> 'facebook']);    When we set up the experiment we can tell it count
> > >> >> all "shareDownload" actions the same.  This also gives us a little
> > >> >> more information.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2) I heard from some users who were confused by the weird URLs they
> > >> >> were directed to.  So we might keep it more generic, like
> > >> >> index1-passthru.html, index2-passthru.html, etc.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 3) Google runs the experiment to see which variation is better than
> > >> >> the control.  But the control is the current page as it is today.
> > >> >> With the last experiment the default page had no social sharing on
> > it.
> > >> >>  So tracking progress was a little bit weird.  I'm not sure what we
> > >> >> can do about that, except be aware of it.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > What we learn from this google experiment we would integrate into
> > the
> > >> >> > templates elsewhere on the site(s).
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Yes.  I'm looking forward to this.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -Rob
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Samer Mansour
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to