Thomas L. Knapp wrote: TK) there is absolutely no doubt that those positions and policy proposals are homophobic and bigoted ... and therefore the distinction between Ron Paul as possibly homophobic/bigoted and his positions and policy proposals as obviously so is a distinction that doesn't make a difference when considering him as a political candidate. (TK
And yet a Steve Kubby press release (with your name on it) says <http://www.kubby2008.com/node/54> of Kubby: SK) if his fellow freedom activists' long-shot bet pays off and Ron Paul becomes the Republican nominee, he will withdraw, ask the party to nominate "None of the Above" at its national convention, and work as a volunteer on Paul's general election campaign. (SK Why would you support an LP candidate who stands ready to defer to, and volunteer for, a Republican for whom you say "there is absolutely no doubt" that the Republican's positions and policy proposals are "homophobic and bigoted"? Have you de-endorsed Kubby yet?
