Part 1<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/marpa-parser/ub5ZOYF3qIQ/fgqZ5uyhu8AJ> .
This script <https://gist.github.com/rns/8435795> produces A blessed rule is in a grammar with no bless_package *The rule was blessed as "lhs"* Marpa::R2 exception at C:\cygwin\home\Ruslan\Marpa-R2-work\no-bless_package-exception.t line 28. This shows that I can obtain unblessed lhs by removing bless_package from the grammar in part 1, if 'A blessed rule is in a grammar with no bless_package' is turned to warning rather than error according to the way it sounds. Makes Sense? Is possible? Or adding *lhs*/*name* to *action* array descriptors is more appropriate? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
