Note to self: This feels more like a quick Worse-is-Better<http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html> hack.
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:11:26 PM UTC+2, rns wrote: > > Part 1<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/marpa-parser/ub5ZOYF3qIQ/fgqZ5uyhu8AJ> > . > > This script <https://gist.github.com/rns/8435795> produces > > A blessed rule is in a grammar with no bless_package > *The rule was blessed as "lhs"* > Marpa::R2 exception at > C:\cygwin\home\Ruslan\Marpa-R2-work\no-bless_package-exception.t line 28. > > > This shows that I can obtain unblessed lhs by removing bless_package from > the grammar in part 1, if 'A blessed rule is in a grammar with no > bless_package' is turned to warning rather than error according to the way > it sounds. > > Makes Sense? Is possible? Or adding *lhs*/*name* to *action* array > descriptors is more appropriate? > > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
