That's a good choice, it has the right connotations: "Don't make this
your first choice, but use it if that's what you need".
By the way, the Marpa parser is powerful enough that the
my_parser_is_so_stupid_it_cant_tell_this_is_one_keyword_without_underscores
approach to syntax is unnecessary. So I'd make it something like
:lexeme ~ <say keyword> override priority => 1
-- jeffrey
On 05/12/2014 06:55 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
How about priority_override for your 'strong priority'?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "marpa parser" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa
parser" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
