I'd need to see this as a patch. If I just drop those lines in, I see
myself mentioning blessing and AST's in a context where they haven't
been defined, and then mentioning the semantics in a place where I'm
avoiding talking about the semantics.
What's the issue? Is it that the reader might be tempted to mix the
kinds of package up?
-- jeffrey
On 08/21/2014 04:37 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
Sure, but I think you're too close to the metal this time. I'm
thinking of a beginner getting confused.
Perhaps just your comment 'The bless package is a package into which
AST nodes can be blessed. The semantics package is a place to look
for semantics.', with minor modifications, could go in both places?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "marpa parser" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa
parser" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
