There's no real reason to have to be familiar with one in order to know the other. In particular, many users will get quite deep into Marpa::R2's semantics, but will never care about bless_package.

Perhaps, what's wanted is, under the description for semantics_package: "Not to be confused with bless_package"; and vice versa?

-- jeffrey

On 08/21/2014 06:44 PM, Ron Savage wrote:

    What's the issue?  Is it that the reader might be tempted to mix
    the kinds of package up?


The issue is coming across one without knowing about the other.

Let me look into a patch.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa 
parser" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to