Note that if you just want a syntax tree, and not a syntax forest, you can simply specify
:default ::= action => [name,values] as your only action, and Marpa will build the syntax tree. The difference is that the forest represents all parses, while the tree represents only one. -- jeffrey On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Ed Avis <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to use Marpa::R2 to parse a document and produce a data > structure showing the syntax tree of the document. Then I'll walk down > that > tree with my own code. Is there a straightforward recipe to do this? > > -- > Ed Avis <[email protected]> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
