I had a look at the forum for commonmark, and it seems that it has a ways to go - the spec currently suffers from similar ambiguity that it set out to fix and there is no explicit grammar to be found. I hope they get there though, and proceed to include the sensible markdown extensions that are around.
On 9 October 2014 08:56, Ron Savage <[email protected]> wrote: > One of the comments to the swim proposal pointed to http://commonmark.org/. > I've just added it to the list of parser proposals: > http://savage.net.au/Perl-modules/html/marpa.papers/chapter5.html. > > We can joke: That's the good thing about standards, there are so many to > choose from. (Nods wisely). And don't get me started on date formats, > especially in protocol documents. > > But a rock-solid parser would make Markdown even more popular. And be a > booster for Marpa. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
