Hi Ron, I haven't submitted any feedback to them and I'm not up on the detail of the ambiguities, I was just reflecting on the content of this thread on their forum:
http://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46 Cheers On 9 October 2014 14:03, Ron Savage <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, this is a problem, but they've definitely got the right idea trying to > pin down the grammar. > > Presumably the lack of a BNF-format grammar reflects their lack of > understanding that Marpa can help. > > Did you submit feedback? If not, let us know and I'll at least ask them to > consider BNF (to save any of us the effort :-). > > Also if not, please list some ambiguities here I can pass on. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
