>G'day George,
>
>There is a way to do this, but I'm not sure whether everyone has access to
>it (I really don't grasp the technology's workings, I'm afraid). I don't
>think this list has discussed a policy on disclosing the e-identities of
>subscribers. For my part, I am happy for such disclosure to happen, but
>maybe that's an issue for Thaxists to discuss first. My reservation is
>based on the tendency of most Thaxists to remain in lurk mode. This may, I
>suppose, be for a good reason (although a few more contributors would
>greatly be appreciated). If Thaxists don't wish to make their feelings
>known on-list, please drop me a line off-list.
>
>Or if the information has always been publicly available, it'd be good to
>know that, too. Moderators should know that sorta stuff, I s'pose ...
>
>Cheers,
>Rob.
This possibility was removed after discussions about not making
things too easy for cyberspooks.
What replaced it was the occasional moderator's report about the
numbers subscribed and a breakdown of their nationalities.
Cheers,
Hugh
--- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
