CB: Problem is using the same terms as classical Marxism and giving them a different meaning. Don't use "relatioins of production" or "forces of production", "antagonism", etc., if you are giving them a different meaning than the classical meaning, because it is just confusing. Make up new terms.
WL: I stated my source in Theories of Surplus Value for my use of antagonism. By classical Marxism you mean your understanding of what constitutes classical. I quoted Marx directly for my use of relations of production. I have outlined my specific placing within the polarity of the communist movement. Make up new terms? Why when I present Marx exact words and you do not. Classical according to whom? Take the African American National Factor. We may disagree and that is all right. What is its classical presentation? You are mistaken and have basically not read the sections of Theory of Surplus Value I indicated and dispute the passages I quoted directly on relations of production from Marx. Wasitline _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list [email protected] To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
