"The ultimate reason for all real crises always remains the poverty and  
restricted consumption of the masses as opposed to the drive of captialist  
production to develop the productive forces as though only the absolute  
consuming 
power of society constituted their outer limit " 
(Capital vol.  III, Moscow, 1959, pp. 
472-73) ; quoted in The Development of Capitalism in  Russia. 
 

Comment 
 
Capital can never employed all the proletarians, all the time or most of  the 
time, and this is a built in restriction on consumption, even during period  
of expanding consumption. This mass of non-producing consumers allows the  
capitalist to set wages. (Non-producing classes is what Marx calls it is the 
top  
portion of the material quoted above). 

Lets try and get behind under consumption as an "ism." 
 
"Under consumption" as an "ism" is a distinct body of politics. The calling  
card of every Social Democrat has always been and remains the battle cry of  
"raise the consuming capacity of the masses." It is the ideology of under  
consumption of the masses, as an "ism," that establishes the political unity  
between capital and its various production units being strangled by a break in  
circulation; the social democrats and their efforts to win the masses to  
preservation of capitalism. 
 
The social democrats American brand, are neatly lining up behind President  
Obama, demanding to raise the consuming capacity of the masses, with an $800  
million spending package promising jobs. Under consumption as an "ism" is  
actually a coherent thought and ideology.  Under consumption as an "ism" is  
pure 
social democratic ideology and politics. One ought not raise concession  
battles to the level of an "ism." 
 
For one to say for instance, the financial crisis of 2008 is ultimately  
related to "restricted consumption of the masses" is just silly. Capital can  
never continuously employed all the proletarians and this is a built in  
restriction on consumption, even during boom times or during periods of  
expanding 
consumption. 
 
Society faces a permanent, unrelenting crisis in/of fixed  capital, which can 
no longer be mitigated by market expansion or deepening  by credit extension. 
Unlike during the time of Marx the falling rate of profit  cannot today be 
overcome on the basis of quantitative market expansion. During  Marx crisis 
could be mitigated through market expansion and the creation of a  real world 
market with colonies. Marx use of the term "world market" meant an  outline of 
a 
world market. Today there is a "for real" world market. In 1850 and  1860 there 
was not.  
 
Dead labor consumes living labor in the absolute sense. During the time of  
Marx dead labor consumption of living labor was mitigated through conversion of 
 a sea of humanity from serfs to modern proletarians and the employed working 
 class expanded in absolute terms. The entire system expanded. Advanced 
robotics  and computerized production process introduces a new quality in to 
the 
game.  Capital is hitting the historical wall
 
Permanent overcapacity in virtually every industry and not just  
overproduction or under consumption is the new reality and this did not exist 
in  1870. 
Permanent overcapacity finds capital feeding on itself in search of  profits. 
Not surplus value but profits or valueless wealth. Valueless wealth is  
impossible and cannot stand for long.  
 

WL. 
 

"Let us suppose that the whole of society is composed only of  industrial 
capitalists and wage-workers. Let us furthermore disregard price  fluctuations, 
which prevent large portions of the total capital from replacing  themselves in 
their average proportions and which, owing to the general  interrelations of 
the entire reproduction process as developed in particular by  credit, must 
always call forth general stoppages of a transient nature. Let us  also 
disregard the sham transactions and speculations, which the credit system  
favours. 
Then, a crisis could only be explained as the result of a disproportion  of 
production in various branches of the economy, and as a result of a  
disproportion 
between the consumption of the capitalists and their accumulation.  But as 
matters stand, the replacement of the capital invested in production  depends 
largely upon the consuming power of the non-producing classes; while the  
consuming power of the workers is limited partly by the laws of wages, partly 
by  
the fact that they are used only as long as they can be profitably employed by  
the capitalist class. The ultimate reason for all real crises always remains 
the  poverty and restricted consumption of the masses as opposed to the drive 
of  capitalist production to develop the productive forces as though only the  
absolute consuming power of society constituted their limit. 
 
_http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/ch30.htm_ 
(http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/ch30.htm)   Vol 3 Chapter 
30. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from 
_http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm_ 
(http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm) 
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
cemailfooterNO62)

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to