>Specifically, in 1921 America roughly 21
> million horses were deployed as the primary energy source in farming. 1921
> was  after the advent of "Fordism," and well after the invention of the
> gasoline  power engine, but the impact of the industrial revolution would not
> reconfigure  the social organization of agricultural labor until roughly 1939
> or what is  called the mechanization of agricultural. The shift of the
> population from  agriculture to industry - the city, occurred in this time 
> frame
> although the  industrial revolution began well over a hundred years before
> the mechanization  of agriculture.

CIs and the UAW. Careful guys, this thread has a huge potential for
self-humiliation built into it.

Horses enabled the first stages of mechanization of agriculture. Have
you ever seen how they still do all those procedures on an Amish farm?
To quite an extent mechanized, much of it horse-powered (which reminds
me to add horses to that list of animals the human animal has
co-evolved with -- wolf-dogs, granary cats and horses).

The motorized mechanization of American agriculture also took place
before 1939 in wheat production. Another interesting aspect of this is
that the sort of industrial capacity to build the very large
agricultural machines also led to a mechanization of warfare (although
in its invasion of Poland, the German army relied to quite an extent
on horse-drawn quartermaster).

I think the other change you need to look at here is the shift to
chemical fertilizers instead of having more self-sufficiency on farms
as 'business units'. If you had a lot of horses, cattle, pigs and
chickens you had your own fertilizer. But with the 'green revolution'
came a shift to chemical fertilizers, separating animal husbandry from
the basic farm unit to quite an extent. You still see older style
farming among the Amish and Mennonite communities, but that is not to
romanticize them--they are awful polluters of the Chesapeake Bay, Ohio
River and Lake Erie because of their heavy use of cow and horse shit
combined with farms that lack greenbelts around the streams and
hedgerows to enclose fields. To quite an extent Amish farmers have
themselves become post-mo farmers, minus the tractors and motorized
harvesters.

The shift in industrial production isn't so much from the MW to the
rest of the world, as it is from the UK, US, UK and Soviet Union, to
Japan, Germany and now China, India and Brazil. And workers in the US,
even if they do manage to organize, face huge obstacles to
accomplishing anything in terms of improving their lot in life if they
are put into competition--all under American-dominated global
capital--with workers who produce under conditions that are
reminiscent of the Pittsburgh area circa 1900.

CJ


ELT in Japan
http://eltinjapan.blogspot.com/

Japan Higher Education Outlook
http://japanheo.blogspot.com/

We are Feral Cats
http://wearechikineko.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to