********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

For the record, on Twitter they did go after Clinton and are saying she is
next. But that's not the point. There is no real point in going after
Clinton, she is not the vanguard!

I'm referring to their commentary about O'Malley which has gone in both
directions. He's irrelevant because of polling.

- Amith

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Sheldon Ranz <[email protected]> wrote:

> What commentary are you referring to?  Mine or the BLM hecklers?  To the
> extent that the hecklers 'praised him', that was just a warning that as
> long as he keeps a low profile in the polls, he's not their main target.
> This has nothing to do with vanguard positioning, since they are targetting
> all declared Dem candidates not named Clinton.
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to