******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
on Sonntag, 4. Oktober 2015 at 20:07, Angelus Novus via Marxism wrote: > Why are people getting all worked up about the totally > non-controversial statement that the manuscript that Engels used as > the basis for Volume III (and which provides the textual passages > for the material on FROP) is older than the manuscript for Vol. I > and the manuscript used for Engels' edition of Volume II? because you try to use this simple fact as a weapon against Marx' scientific and political legacy. Cheers, Lüko Willms Frankfurt/Main, Germany http://www.mlwerke.de _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
