******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
Try telling that to the (otherwise very rational) former classmate of mine --- a cardiac surgeon no less --- he actually got insulted that I refused to look at the photograph of the hole in the Pentagon .... (so it goes ....) On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 4:08 PM DW via Marxism <[email protected]> wrote: > ******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** > #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. > #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. > #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. > ***************************************************************** > > Michael, this, actually, is my *favorite* conspiracy. The assumption is > that the outline of the aircraft, wings and all, should be visible somehow > in the hole that remained. In reality the "hardest part" of any plane is > not the fuselage and certainly not the lightly built wings. In fact it is > the compressor shaft/turbine blade of the engines that do the most > penetrating. Everything else just crumples up a like an aluminum can > crushed on a busy street. The body *does* penetrate in the process of > coming apart on impact. > > David > _________________________________________________________ > Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm > Set your options at: > https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/mameerop%40gmail.com > _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
