First, you mentioned a "single couple," I was pointing out that the mitochondrial Eve had nothing to do with a notion of a single, founding couple.
As for the rest-- you really need to look at this from the biological, genetic view, not from your ideological point of view. Most Recent Common Ancestor-- I said "Eve" is a bad way of classifying this. Yes, Eve had sisters-- guess what? They all had the same mitochondrial DNA. This has nothing to do with creationism. Read the science and get off your ideological, abstract, hermetically sealed, high horse. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shane Mage" <shm...@pipeline.com> To: "David Schanoes" <sartes...@earthlink.net> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:59 PM Subject: Re: [Marxism] Tweaking of DNA dating on human evolution ________________________________________________ YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
